FIRST ‘CHINESE’ WERE AFRICAN/NEGRO PEOPLE
That happens to be a fact based on Chinese research. About 50,000 years ago, a group of Africans with features IDENTICAL TO THE KONG-SAN (BUSHMAN) AND Bantu migrated to China and settled in the southern part of China. Eventually, that group migrated to other parts of China all the way to Siberia. (See National Geographic magazine on that issue). The prehistoric Africans came in two types and two types of genes dominated these groups. One type of gene called the Cde gene moved from South Africa to Sudan and to India, then southward into SE Asia and China. That gene is found at over 80 percent in the Kong-San of South Africa, the medium to short people with ‘yellowish-brown’ skins, ‘epicantus fold’ ( so-called ‘slanting’ eyes – a feature found among a very large number of Africans incuding very blackish Africans of Sudan and the Sahara, Nigeria and Congo/Angola), high cheekbones, small stature, very kinky hair. Genetically, the Kong are 100 percent PURE NEGROES AND IT IS FROM THE KONG BUSHMAN WHO WERE ONCE SPREAD FROM SOUTH AFRICA TO GERMANY, EASTWARD TO SIBERIA AND INTO THE AMERICAS that all Asian ‘Mongoloid’ people originated.
KONG GENES IN THE NAVAJO AND OTHER AMERICAN INDIANS
The Kong-San and other Africans also entered the Americas as early as 75,000 to 30,000 years ago, says scientists (see THE GLADWIN THESIS, by C.S. Gladwin “A History of the African-Olmecs,’ pub. by http://www.AuthorHouse.com http://www.blackplanet.com/Nubianem The Navajo Indians of Arizona/New Mexico are racially of the MONGOLOID RACE, but their genes show about 20-30 percent Kong-San (South African ‘Bushman’ genes called Cde).
The Cde gene is also found in large amounts in Bantu Africans, West Africans, Rwandan Hutus, Tutsis, East Africans, Congolese, Egyptians, Pakistanis, Indians of India, Chinese, Japanese, Melanesians, Australian Aboriginals, Melanesians. Some Europeans also have the Cde gene.
ANCIENT TRADE AND TRAVEL BETWEEN AFRICA AND CHINA
Africans similar to the Arignacian culture (advanced weapons, tools, clothing, body red ocre, languages culture) migrated to Europe about 50,000 years ago from the Sudan/Somalia region. They first passed into Arabia and moved into Europe.
Another branch of Africans who had migrated into India about 60,000 B.C. (THE ANDAMAN ISLANDERS ARE SOME OF THEIR DESCENDENTS http://www.andaman.org )moved into Europe as soon as the ice melted – about 40,000 B.C. Others moved into Central Asia. The African gene mutated in Central Asia near China and spred into northern China, Siberia and that region. One group of genes moved into Southern China and upward into Northern China. See http://members.tripod.com/pointingbird/lostfeatherintl/id59.htm
The great mystry in this spread of African genes and people to China and East Asia is that THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN CHRISTIANITY AND THE ‘GREAT FLOOD’ also seem to match the genetic and physical spread of the descendants of the Chinese and other Mongoloid and Negro-Australoid Asians from Africa and the Levant.
According to the TABLE OF NATIONS http://www.soundchristian.com/man AFTER THE GREAT FLOOD, NOAH (WHO WAS MOST LIKELY NEGROID) and his sons populated the earth.
Noah’s sons included:
Ham (Negroids, Mongoloids, Negro-Australoids)
Japhet (Western Europeans, Eastern Europeans)
Ham’s descendants included:
Cush- Sudan to South Africa, west to West Africa and the Americas, East to India,
Punt: Somalia to South Africa – along the coasts;
Canaan: Sinai to Turkey
According to some historians, Canaan or ‘Chan-han’ was the Negro son of Ham. Canaan had two sons. One was called Heth (related to the Hittites; the other was called Sin (Related to THE ‘SINITES’ OR CHINESE).
Heth settled from Turkey to Northern/Central China, Western China..
Sin settled Southern China, Central China, Northern China.
Similarities between Chinese, Japanese and Korean with African languages
Two sons of Cush called ‘Hind’ and ‘Sind’ settle from Arabia to India and all the way to Indo-China.
Canaan’s children and the FATHER OF THE MELANESIAN, AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINES AND OTHER BLACKS OF EAST ASIA SETTLED IN THAT REGION FROM CAMBODIA TO SOUTHERN CHINA TO AUSTRALIA. These include the Oceanic Negroes.
Therefore, all the Asian peoples, whether Mongoloid, Negroid or Negro-Australoid are descendants of Canaan. The present conditions of groups like the Melanesians and Australian Aborigines are recent in history for the most part. Many of these groups once lived in India and China and were driven into the Islands by the catastrophic flooding of Southern China about 5000 B.C., as well as the migration of very lightskinned Mongoloid nomads from Northern China/Siberia and Northwestern China beginning with the Chou about 1100 B.C.
(see http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/runoko.html )
BLACK/MONGOLOID SHIA AND SHANG DYNASTIES
According to historians (Brodie, Van Sertima, Runoko, et al..), the first Chinese Dyasties in China were not entirely Mongoloid. In fact, these dynasties were composed of Southern Mongoloids and Oceanic/Africoid Negroids as well as ‘Dimunitive’ Negroids similar to the Agta, Semang and Negritoes. Such groups remained powerful in SE Asia till the 10 century when the Mongol displacement and pushing of Northern Mongoloids people began with the rise of the Khans.
Yet, in ancient times, the Blacks of Southern China, Melanesia and IndoChina established a strong trading relationship with Africa’s East and NorthEast coast. In fact, apart from the prehistoric Africans who settled China and East Asia. Africans between 10,000 B.C. to the Christian era traded with India, Cambodia, SE Asia, China and Japan. Africans also traded in bananas with the people of Papua-New Guinea, Fiji and the region thereof (see Archeology magazine, September 2006, on the ancient trade between Melanesia and Africa about 5000 years ago.)
According to African historians, one of the more contemporary Africans to settle China was Hu-Na-Kunte, a Mesopotamian Cushite with Sudanese/East African roots. The ancient Mesopotamians were Cushites related to Sudanese and other Africans. About 2800 B.C., Hu Na Kunte sailed to China and settled on the Loh River Valley. From that period, trade between Africa and China has taken place.
African records (Egypt, Ethiopia, Cush) show that to be the case. Chinese records show that about 600 B.C., shipping from China to the Ethiopian Port of Myus Homus took place.
During the Negau-Punt culture – also called the ‘Swahili” (3000 B.C. to 1700 A.D.)
There was also extensive trade between China and Africa. In fact, Chinese pocelain is found scattered in ancient sites from Somalia to South Africa/Zimbabwe. In all these regions – the world’s longest, continuous urban sea towns and cities were built BY AFRICANS LONG BEFORE THE SWAHILI PERIOD. This is the area that the Egyptians called ‘Punt’ or ‘God’s Land’ and it was from that region that they claimed to have originated.
MORE ON THE ANCIENT CHINESE WEST AFRICAN TRADE THROUGH THE AMERICAS
See, “A History of the African-Olmecs: Black Civilizations of America From Prehistoric Times to the Present Era,” pub. by http://www.AuthorHouse.com
Also see Susu Economics,” pub. by http://www.AuthorHouse.com
In retrospect, THE ANCIENT HISTORY OF TRADE, CONTACT AND RELATIONS WITH CHINA EXISTED EVEN BEFORE ALL OF CHINA WAS PREDOMINANTLY MONGOLOID. In fact, appearances may be deceiving. Today’s Chinese may actually be a people composed of three Black/Negroid races, one Mongoloid race and one Caucasian race. When one looks at the Uiger, one sees some Caucasian features. When one looks at Southern and Central/Eastern Chinese, one sees lots of Negroid/Kong-San features. When one looks at Northern Chinese one sees some Caucasian/Negroid/Mongoloid features. When one looks at South-Eastern Chinese, one sees Negro-Australoid and Mongoloid features.
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE ANCIENT BLACK AND MONGOLOID ‘SHANG DYNASTY’?
It is very possible that this dynasty exists today in the people we call the Polynesians. In fact, about 5 years ago, the magazine Discovery or Scientific American wrote a lengthy article on that very issue.
There are others who say that the Negro-Mongoloid Dynasty of Southern China moved into Indo-China or to the remove parts of the South China/Vietnam mountain region ( the Moi People, the Montagnards of Vietnam, the Semang and other Negrito and Negrito-Mongoloid people).
The book, “African Presence in Early Asia,” points out that the Black and the Mongoloids of the Shang Dynasty fled in all directions after the overthrow of the Chou. Some migrated as far as Mexico, WHERE THEY MET AN ALREADY ESTABLISHED NEGRO-AMERICAN INDIAN CIVILIZATION CALLED THE ‘OLMEC’ OR MANDING-SHI. The Manding-Shi are of West African/Sudanic origins.
See http://originalblacksoftheamericasbeforecolumbus.blogspot .com
Finally, THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AFRICANS AND CHINESE MUST BE MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL, WITH MUTUAL RESPECT AND MUTUAL HUMAN RECOGNITION OF EACH OTHER.
That has been the idea for over 10,000 years of trade between Africa and the Melanesia/China/SE Asia region. IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN TREATING THE OTHER WITH RESPECT AND DIGNITY AND BEING FAIR AND HONEST IN OBJECTIVES.
It is important to note that some of the people who are staunchly Africanist and support trade and commerce between Africa and China are Americans, particulary African-Americans. Why? Because of the knowledge of history and because of the fact that many American companies have moved to China. Some of these companies used to be in the African-American community. As they move to China, Chinese companies form JOINT VENTURES WITH AFRICANS AND AFRICANS INVEST IN AMERICA AND ALSO IN BLACK AMERICA, BLACK TECHNOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL EXPERTS MOVE TO PARTS OF AFRICA AND HELP TEACH OR PLAN AND COOPERATE WITH AFRICAN GOVERNMENTS.
So, this cycle CAN BE BENEFICIAL TO ALL. Let us hope it does some good, but at the same time, WE MUST SUPPORT THE CHINESE AND UNDERSTAND IF THEY FEEL UNCOMFORTABLE ABOUT CERTAIN THINGS…AFETR ALL, THE CHINESE ARE TRADING WITH THE ENTIRE WORLD — NOT JUST SOME OF IT. If the rest of the world are not comfortable with a situation and want the Chinese to lend a hand, we may have to realize that the world is smaller and whatever we do in one part affects others in another part.